Skip to main content

'Bleeting' on about climate change

Blogging the tweets ('bleeting') received from our Annual Lecture with Kevin Anderson

By Amanda Woodman-Hardy

This week we held our Annual Lecture with special guest Kevin Anderson from the Tyndall Centre at the University of Manchester. As I was helping out at the event, I didn’t get to see all of it (I’ll be watching it online when the video is posted) so I thought instead I would share with you some of the tweets and comments received from members of the public who attended the event.

We handed out postcards on the night with two sides, one asking what had inspired you this evening and the other side asking what will you do as a result? We had a very diverse audience with people from government, charities and NGOs, education, health, and sustainability organisations. This lead to some very diverse responses. Some were interesting, relevant and empowering. Others were depressing, shocking or hopeless. This in itself shows the problems that we face in communicating climate change to people who are from different backgrounds, with different beliefs and different personal levels of optimism, pessimism and realism.

Kevin Anderson was quite blunt in explaining that if we keep doing what we’re doing and don’t make any changes to our lives now to make them more energy efficient and sustainable, then climate change will cause at least 4 - 6 degrees of warming with potentially horrendous consequences for the people and biodiversity of the world.

Some interesting tweets came through Twitter on the night and the days that followed, showing that the outcome of the event had stuck in people’s minds.

The negative tweets

“The fiction of climate science -in particular emission modelling is hard wired by policy paymasters.K. Anderson”

“Looking for good news that humans aren't doomed, but not hopeful!”

“#cabot2012 The future is impossible.”

“well, #cabot2012 was extremely interesting, sobering and downright scary. My summary - don't bank on your grandkids having a planet.”

“Looking for optimism but ending in pessimism...”

“Kevin Anderson blowing apart any notion of limiting global temp rise to 2C as a realistic goal. 4,5 or even 6 far more likely. #cabot2012”

The positive tweets

“Key questions @cabotinstitute ... How can we frame the issue for people who would avert their attention? Including us? Lots on rule...”

Some ideas to reduce demand http://www.bristol247.com/2012/11/06/how-you-can-be-part-of-the-low-carbon-revolution-85245/

“What a fantastic #Cabot2012 lecture from Kevin Anderson this evening - many thanks to the @cabotinstitute - I AM FEELING INSPIRED FOR CHANGE”

“Eye opening talk from Kevin Anderson last night #cabot2012, time to face up to reality of climatechange”

“Well done #Cabot2012 for hosting Kevin Anderson's challenging lecture today! His is a message we, as scientists, should be listening to.”

“Kevin Anderson: "There are lots of things we can do, both from the bottom-up and the top-down." #Cabot2012”

“Strange that so many climate change scientists persist in flying to international conferences. Great talk from Kevin Anderson #cabot2012”

“Straight talking presentation about the reality of carbon and climate change last night from Kevin Anderson #cabot2012 http://ow.ly/f5DHC”

“#cabot2012 Kevin Anderson brilliant talk "all estimates in analysis are way below reality" 4degree future increase Global mean surface temp”

The remarks on the postcards were just as varied. What follows are the responses from a random selection of postcards filled in by attendees on the night.

What inspired you this evening?

“Driving certain cars on the market would reduce emissions by 40 -50%”.

“Why can’t we stop having babies?”

“You can’t trust very much of what you are told but there are true independent voices out there”

“The feisty nature of the audience”

“The fact that a climate scientist admitted that many numbers that projections and estimates are based on are incorrect”

“It was refreshing to see an academic so unequivocally calling out his colleagues for their hypocritical behaviour in talking about climate change but continuing to engage in high-emitting activities”

“Confirmation that we need to act”

“Kevin was willing and determined to be honest”

“That real change is possible through simple things such as stopping flying, walking and cycling to get around”

What will you do as a result?

“Won’t have children and accept that the human race is ****ed – we deserve it”

“I would like to see the Cabot Institute commit to the values it appears to espouse by reducing emissions from its events and research as much as possible – e.g. by not flying academics to climate change conferences”

“Keep trying to learn the facts and be vocal with others about what I learn”

“Talk to people who are not already converted”

“Spread the word and read up more about climate change”

“Support/lobby MP and continue to strive for greener low carbon lifestyle. Influence others.”

“Stay positive, be honest, change the economy”

“Try to stop flying. Try to shop more by bicycle rather than driving”.

It is refreshing to see a group of randomly selected respondents who want to make a change. The main message that came out of Kevin Anderson’s talk was to spread the word and educate others in the hope of reducing emissions in our everyday lives.

You can read all the responses from the event here

Did you go to the Kevin Anderson event? What do you think of everyone’s responses above? Is it what you expected? Is there something that hasn’t been said? Feel free to comment on this blog, we would love to hear your opinions.

Read more about Kevin's work here

Interesting article from Ben Connor 'The art of burying your head in the sand'in reference to Kevin Anderson's talk.

Read Craig Comstock's blog piece about the event in the Huffington Post.

Popular posts from this blog

Converting probabilities between time-intervals

This is the first in an irregular sequence of snippets about some of the slightly more technical aspects of uncertainty and risk assessment.  If you have a slightly more technical question, then please email me and I will try to answer it with a snippet. Suppose that an event has a probability of 0.015 (or 1.5%) of happening at least once in the next five years. Then the probability of the event happening at least once in the next year is 0.015 / 5 = 0.003 (or 0.3%), and the probability of it happening at least once in the next 20 years is 0.015 * 4 = 0.06 (or 6%). Here is the rule for scaling probabilities to different time intervals: if both probabilities (the original one and the new one) are no larger than 0.1 (or 10%), then simply multiply the original probability by the ratio of the new time-interval to the original time-interval, to find the new probability. This rule is an approximation which breaks down if either of the probabilities is greater than 0.1. For example

1-in-200 year events

You often read or hear references to the ‘1-in-200 year event’, or ‘200-year event’, or ‘event with a return period of 200 years’. Other popular horizons are 1-in-30 years and 1-in-10,000 years. This term applies to hazards which can occur over a range of magnitudes, like volcanic eruptions, earthquakes, tsunamis, space weather, and various hydro-meteorological hazards like floods, storms, hot or cold spells, and droughts. ‘1-in-200 years’ refers to a particular magnitude. In floods this might be represented as a contour on a map, showing an area that is inundated. If this contour is labelled as ‘1-in-200 years’ this means that the current rate of floods at least as large as this is 1/200 /yr, or 0.005 /yr. So if your house is inside the contour, there is currently a 0.005 (0.5%) chance of being flooded in the next year, and a 0.025 (2.5%) chance of being flooded in the next five years. The general definition is this: ‘1-in-200 year magnitude is x’ = ‘the current rate for eve

Coconuts and climate change

Before pursuing an MSc in Climate Change Science and Policy at the University of Bristol, I completed my undergraduate studies in Environmental Science at the University of Colombo, Sri Lanka. During my final year I carried out a research project that explored the impact of extreme weather events on coconut productivity across the three climatic zones of Sri Lanka. A few months ago, I managed to get a paper published and I thought it would be a good idea to share my findings on this platform. Climate change and crop productivity  There has been a growing concern about the impact of extreme weather events on crop production across the globe, Sri Lanka being no exception. Coconut is becoming a rare commodity in the country, due to several reasons including the changing climate. The price hike in coconuts over the last few years is a good indication of how climate change is affecting coconut productivity across the country. Most coconut trees are no longer bearing fruits and thos