Skip to main content

The Earth comes to Bristol

Luke Jerram's Earth installation at the University of Bristol. Image credit: Becky Arnold.
Humans have gazed at the moon since our origin, yet the Earth has only been visible in its entirety for the last 50 years.

The present era is a time of great need. A time where humans need to change our relationship with the planet and to change our relationship, we need to change our perspective. Luke Jerram’s Gaia hosted by the Cabot Institute is an art installation which seems at least in part envisioned to do that through simulating the “overview effect”.

The “overview effect” is a common experience described by astronauts who have seen the Earth from space. It is said that seeing the planet hanging in space, in all its majestic beauty leads the viewer towards a cognitive shift in their perception of themselves, the world and its future. It seems somewhat ironic that only by consequence of venturing into and exploring the space around our planet, do we realize how infinitely valuable our home is.
The thing that really surprised me was that it [Earth] projected an air of fragility. And why, I don’t know. I don’t know to this day. I had a feeling it’s tiny, it’s shiny, it’s beautiful, it’s home, and it’s fragile.
— Michael Collins, Apollo 11

Luke Jerram’s Gaia gives the viewer the next best way to ponder and wonder about this planet that is our home. To feel gratitude for the richness of life that it brings, and to cultivate a resolve to protect it. Like the Moon installation, the room was full of people gazing up, captivated and motionless. We’ve all seen models of moons and classroom globes of the earth, but it's another thing to see them at scale and the company of a magnificent hall. The effect of scaling and decorating is not simply additive, it’s synergistic. It was accompanied with a surround-sound score by composer Dan Jones which featured classical music with extracts of interviews and speeches from past astronauts and Sir David Attenborough which invoked a sense profundity and urgency to arise to the challenges that our planet faces.

Luke Jerram's Earth. People gazing up, captivated and motionless. Image credit: Amanda Woodman-Hardy

Standing before it, I experienced a deep and silent state of awe, I felt a sense of sadness and remorse as my realization of its uncertain future took hold. However, not everyone immediately connected to it in the same way, some wished they could see Europe so they could connect themselves more strongly to it. It didn’t seem to mean as much if they couldn’t see where they lived. Which I think in part reflects the problem that we have at addressing global problems. We don’t live globally; we live locally, and for most of our history as a species, we’ve thought locally. Now, we live and think somewhere in between the two, we are part of a globalized economic and political framework, we travel, we communicate with people all over the world but when it comes to our consumer choices, it's difficult to connect the impacts of our purchases and actions on the rest of the world. Nevertheless, we are shifting towards the “think globally, act locally” mentality which is essential in order to transition to a sustainable and circular way of living.

It’s shifting because of installations like this, collaborative research networks such as the Cabot Institute, the passionate and relentless work of scientists, the actions and communications of climate activists and climate organizations such as Extinction Rebellion. The timing of this could not be more pertinent to the challenges and movements of today. The discussions around climate change are becoming more lucid and visceral than ever and our actions are rapidly accelerating. It’s vital that the momentum is maintained through exhibits like this to keep the conversation buzzing in our minds and our collective consciousness.

This blog is written by Cabot Institute member Gaël Gobaille-Shaw, University of Bristol School of Chemistry. He is currently designing new electrocatalysts for the conversion of CO2 to liquid fuels.
For updates on this work, follow @CatalysisCDT @Gael_Gobaille and @UoB_Electrochem on Twitter.

Gael Gobaille-Shaw

Popular posts from this blog

Converting probabilities between time-intervals

This is the first in an irregular sequence of snippets about some of the slightly more technical aspects of uncertainty and risk assessment.  If you have a slightly more technical question, then please email me and I will try to answer it with a snippet. Suppose that an event has a probability of 0.015 (or 1.5%) of happening at least once in the next five years. Then the probability of the event happening at least once in the next year is 0.015 / 5 = 0.003 (or 0.3%), and the probability of it happening at least once in the next 20 years is 0.015 * 4 = 0.06 (or 6%). Here is the rule for scaling probabilities to different time intervals: if both probabilities (the original one and the new one) are no larger than 0.1 (or 10%), then simply multiply the original probability by the ratio of the new time-interval to the original time-interval, to find the new probability. This rule is an approximation which breaks down if either of the probabilities is greater than 0.1. For example

1-in-200 year events

You often read or hear references to the ‘1-in-200 year event’, or ‘200-year event’, or ‘event with a return period of 200 years’. Other popular horizons are 1-in-30 years and 1-in-10,000 years. This term applies to hazards which can occur over a range of magnitudes, like volcanic eruptions, earthquakes, tsunamis, space weather, and various hydro-meteorological hazards like floods, storms, hot or cold spells, and droughts. ‘1-in-200 years’ refers to a particular magnitude. In floods this might be represented as a contour on a map, showing an area that is inundated. If this contour is labelled as ‘1-in-200 years’ this means that the current rate of floods at least as large as this is 1/200 /yr, or 0.005 /yr. So if your house is inside the contour, there is currently a 0.005 (0.5%) chance of being flooded in the next year, and a 0.025 (2.5%) chance of being flooded in the next five years. The general definition is this: ‘1-in-200 year magnitude is x’ = ‘the current rate for eve

Coconuts and climate change

Before pursuing an MSc in Climate Change Science and Policy at the University of Bristol, I completed my undergraduate studies in Environmental Science at the University of Colombo, Sri Lanka. During my final year I carried out a research project that explored the impact of extreme weather events on coconut productivity across the three climatic zones of Sri Lanka. A few months ago, I managed to get a paper published and I thought it would be a good idea to share my findings on this platform. Climate change and crop productivity  There has been a growing concern about the impact of extreme weather events on crop production across the globe, Sri Lanka being no exception. Coconut is becoming a rare commodity in the country, due to several reasons including the changing climate. The price hike in coconuts over the last few years is a good indication of how climate change is affecting coconut productivity across the country. Most coconut trees are no longer bearing fruits and thos